It's my understanding that no one will be prescribed ADD medication without a diagnosis of being ADD. As for what effect the medication has on the person - that needs to be coordinated with the doctor that gave the prescription. I've read that some people do not get any benefit from the medication - and they have ADD. Some people have side effects that outweigh the meds' benefits.
And certainly no one should be taking ADD medications without a proper diagnosis of being ADD. I've also heard of parents taking their kids' meds because they think they have ADD.
Would a person who is not ADD benefit from ADD medication. I am not talking about abuse but normal prescribed usage. Or would the medication have no effect on the individual?
[QUOTE=Shaggy]Would a person who is not ADD benefit from ADD medication. I am not talking about abuse but normal prescribed usage. Or would the medication have no effect on the individual?
[/QUOTE]
In my opinion, the meds are basically speed. Anyone can get more done on speed, including ADDr's. And frequently doctors prescribe these meds to anyone who suspects they might have ADD.
Aren't most of these medications basically methamphetamines? Thanks for the response. I was just wondering from a neurochemical stand point. I am actually on strattera which is not a controlled substance...but I can understand if someone who is not ADD and takes adderall they may feel an effect. actually strattera is not a methamphetamine and works like an antideppresent by restricting the uptake of certain neurochemicals.Everyone with or without ADHD will feel more alert and focused on a stimulant (amphetamine, Adderall, Ritalin). Only people with ADHD will get more organized, sleep better, less anxious or more motivated. Strattera increases the norepinephrine in the brain like certain antidepressants. Strattera may have a weak antidepressant effect. "Speed" is most properly referring to amphetamine (Adderall, Dexedrine) or methamphetamine (crystal meth, Desoxyn). Ritalin is methylphenidate which is just a different type of stimulant. Stimulants are used as add-on treatments for some lethargic depressions by the way. ADHDMD38526.7516550926methamphetamines are about 20x more potent than amphetamines, it couldn't be used as a medication as it drives you mad within a few hours. if u want quite a good explanation of the side effets of meth, try watching this movie spunThanks for the clarifications. Due to an extended family member getting caught up in methamphetamines in the past, our family has learned the horrible dangers of long term use of this drug. I don't want to have anything to do with such a drug and I'm glad to get the differences of the medications from such a drug.
autumn
That one I haven't seen but there were several that we've watched, as well as network documentaries on the long term effects: how people on Meth age DRAMATICALLY within a short period of time and how they now believe that it turns people schizophrenic for life - even if they can get away from it.Sleep disorders. Lack of quality sleep can cause a lot of the same "symptoms" of ADD. That is why it is very important to talk to a regular physician before starting medications to be sure that there isn't an underlying physical condition that could be treated.
My youngest son started showing signs of being ADD and with myself and my oldest son being diagnosed it sounded like a no-brainer, but something in me (call it mommy instincts) just didn't feel right about it. Sure enough he had enlarged tonsils and adnoids, he had surgery just last Thursday.
What if someone was mistakenly diagnosed with ADD/ADHD and had something else. I know that sometimes they say that ADD and manic depression have very similar symptoms. Is there anything else out there that could be mistaken for ADD?
Thanks!
I'm not trying to defend drug abuse, but there seem to be some misconceptions here.OK (trying to understand here) So you're saying that Meth in small prescribed doses help people with certain necessary needs - such as those of us with specific AD/HD disorders... Am I getting that right?
And just as with ANY drug or substance, using large doses are dangerous no matter what it is...
So a couple questions just popped in my brain - hopefully I remember them to get them out - for the people making the meth in their own homes - how dangerous is the fact that they're making these drugs on their own without knowing how true meth prescriptions are made by companies?
And I'm wondering (as the earlier posts were asking) if small prescribed doses of these meth drugs are helpful to specific people - what effect would large illegal doses do to people who just small doses would help? And what effect would these large doses do to people who don't need the meth drugs at all?
Sorry if these are stupid questions, just trying to understand...
A pharmaceutical form of meth exists in a drug called Desoxyn, it is not prescribed much anymore but used to be for people who had adverse reactions to amphetamine's effects on the body, as you can get the same mental stimulation from meth with less effects on the body (and especially the heart).Geez, thanks for going into that detail. That helps me to understand.
ok, so how do they figure out what 'normal' brain function is compared to what we're dealing with? Back to my old question I have - I didn't know that what I go through wasn't normal - so how do I know when I'll be 'normal'?!?
Well, "normal" brain function in the sense of ADD is normal prefrontal cortex activity which can usually show up on a SPECT gamma ray imaging scan, but even that isn't always right and doesn't tell you much by itself.